Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00390 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Flywheel Sports, Inc.’s (“Flywheel”) Opposed Sealed Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions (“Motion for Leave”). Dkt. No. 140. In this Motion for Leave, Flywheel seeks to amend its invalidity contentions to add a Jul y 2011 “Flywheel@Home” reference, and Flywheel contends that this reference demonstrates both Flywheel’s prior and independent development of the subject matter of Peloton’s patents and the obviousness of Peloton’s invention. Id. at 1.