Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Luminati Networks Ltd. v. UAB Tesonet, No. 2:18-cv-00299 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00299, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
August 20, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
62 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On July 31, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 9,241,044 and 9,742,866. Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties in their claim construc tion briefing (Dkt. Nos. 61, 70, & 82),1 having considered the intrinsic evidence, and having made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence, the Court hereby issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v.