Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Infinera Corporation, No. 2:18-cv-00206 (E.D. Tex. June 25, 2019)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00206, Dkt. No. 86
Decided
June 25, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 39 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING LICENSE AND RELEASE DEFENSES filed by Infinera Corporation
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Infinera Corporation’s (“Infinera”) Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Its License and Release Defenses (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 39.) The Court heard oral argument on the Motion on June 12, 2019. (Dkt. No. 74.) Also before the Court are Plaintiff Oyster Optics, LLC’s (“Oyster”) Notice of Supplemental Material Facts and Notice of Inaccurate Case Quote in Defendant’s Slide and Argument at Hearing, (collectively, the “Notice” or “Notices”), and Infinera’s Response to Plaintiff’s Presentation Notice (the “Response”). (Dkt.