Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Semcon IP Inc. v. Kyocera Corporation, No. 2:18-cv-00197 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00197, Dkt. No. 41
Decided
May 3, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 11 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) filed by Kyocera Corporation
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Kyocera Corporation’s (“Kyocera”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 11.) Having considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant case law, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2018, Plaintiff Semcon IP Inc. (“Semcon”) sued Kyocera for direct and indirect infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.