Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wpem, LLC v. Soti Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00156 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2020)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00156, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
February 4, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant S OTI Inc.’s (“SOTI”) Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 39.) The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the Motion on November 20, 2019. (Dkt. No. 51.) At the conclusion of said hearing, the Court ordered the parti es to file supplemental briefing directed to what steps Plaintiff WPEM, LL C (“WPEM”) undertook in conducting its pre -suit inves tigation. (Id.