Implicit, LLC v. Netscout Systems, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-00053 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Sandvine Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 18.) Having considered the Motion and briefing, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, for the reasons set forth herein. Plaintiff Implicit, LLC (“Implicit”) sued Defendant Sandvine Corporation (“Sandvine”) on May 31, 2018, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.