Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:18-cv-00041 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00041, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
April 15, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
36 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 20, 2019, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in the U.S. Patent No. 7,020,106 (the “’106 Patent”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 71, 77 , and 81 ) and argume nts. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).