Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lemaire Illumination Technologies, LLC v. HTC Corporation, No. 2:18-cv-00021 (E.D. Tex. May 6, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00021, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
May 6, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 21, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No . 6,095,611 (“the ’661 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the Parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. (See Dkt. Nos. 30 , 33, 35.) The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); see also Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct.