Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services, No. 2:17-cv-00768 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2019)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00768, Dkt. No. 73
Decided
February 7, 2019
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Order
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SPECIALIZED MONITORING SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT SECURITY SERVICES, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:17-CV-768-WCB-RSP FINAL JUDGMENT In an order filed today, the Court has granted summary judgment in favor of defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services summary judgment and against plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions LLC on the ground that the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,657,533 are invalid under 35 U.S.C.