Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00736 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The parties stipulated that or al arguments are not necessary for construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 7,690,556. See Dkt. No. 69. Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties in their claim construction br iefing (Dkt. Nos. 63, 66, & 67), 1 having considered the intrinsic evidence, and ha ving made subsidiary fa ctual findings about the extrinsic evidence, the Court hereby issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc); Teva Pharm.