Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Emed Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products, No. 2:17-cv-00728 (E.D. Tex. June 4, 2018)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00728, Dkt. No. 46
Decided
June 4, 2018
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant RMS’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue under Rule 12(b)(3). Dkt. No. 7. The motion is GRANTED, and this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. BACKGROUND Plaintiff EMED Technologies Corp. (“EMED”) is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in El Dorado Hills, California. EMED owns U.S. Pate nt No.