Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Powerled Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00715 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00715, Dkt. No. 351
Decided
June 17, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies LLC’s (“Polaris”) objection to the preadmission of exhibit DX 63 , proffered by Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Samsung”). (See Dkt. No. 335.) Having considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth herein, the Cour t overrules Polaris’s objection and finds that DX 63 should be and hereby is PREADMITTED pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence (“FRE”) 807. I.