Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. Wistron Corporation, No. 2:17-cv-00711 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00711, Dkt. No. 247
Decided
June 21, 2019
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Length
54 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn, LLC’s opening claim construction brief (Docket No. 100), Defendants Texas Instruments and Wistron Corporation’s joint response (Docket No. 104) and Plaintiff’s reply (Docket No. 106). The Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in the U.S. Patent No. 7,233,305 (the “ ’305 Patent”). Docket No. 123. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the Page 2 of 54 disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v.