Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tessera Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00671 (E.D. Tex. July 19, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00671, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
July 19, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Mo tion to Stay Pending Determination of Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 91) (“the Motion”). Having cons idered the Motion and for the reasons stated below, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Tessera filed the Complaint on September 28, 2017, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,512,298 (“the ’298 Patent”) and 6,852,616 (“the ’616 Patent”). (Dkt. No.