Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

IDB Ventures LLC v. Charlotte Russe Holdings, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00660 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00660, Dkt. No. 137
Decided
December 28, 2018
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several motions relating to requests by plaintiff IDB Ventures, LLC, (“IDB”) to amend its complaint and infringement contentions in its action against defendant Academy, Ltd. (“Academy”). The various motions are Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Against Academy, Ltd., Dkt. No. 92, in which IDB s ought leave to file its Second Amended Complaint against Academy; IDB Ventures, LLC’s Opposed Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint , Dkt. No.