Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00651 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00651, Dkt. No. 229
Decided
April 17, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
REDACTED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Re: 209 (klc, ).
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd .’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Strike Certain Opinions in the Amended Expert Report of R. Christopher Rosenthal (“the Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 175) and Samsung’s Second Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Uniloc’s Damages Expert R. Christopher Rosenthal (“the Daubert Motion”) (Dkt. No. 184).