Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. AT&T, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00593 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00593, Dkt. No. 1
Decided
August 21, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re Motion to Sever and Stay
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, the Court now cons iders HTC’s and AT&T’s Motion to Sever and Stay Claims Against Newly-Added Defendant AT&T, Inc. [Dkt. # 55].1 Notice [Dkt. # 70].For the following reasons, the Court will GRANT the motion. I. BACKGROUND Joe Salazar sued HTC Corpor ation in October 2016 alle ging infringement of U.S. Patent 5,802,467. Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. The ’467 Patent is generally directed to a system for sound and data transmission and reception. ’467 Patent [54].