Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. ZTE Corporation et al, No. 2:17-cv-00561 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00561, Dkt. No. 93
Decided
September 7, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
61 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On August 28, 2018, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,394,432 (“the ’432 Patent”), 7,397,431 (“the ’431 Patent”), 8,941,541 (“the ’541 Patent”), 8,976,069 (“the ’069 Patent”), 9,054,421 (“the ’421 Patent”), 9,240,632 (“the ’632 Patent”), and 9,362,617 (“the ’617 Patent”.) The Court has considered the arguments made by the Parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. (See Dkt. Nos.