Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Veraseal LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00527 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2018)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00527, Dkt. No. 88
Decided
May 11, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 45 MOTION to Stay filed by Closure Systems International, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is intervenor -defendant Closure Systems I nternational, Inc. ’s (“CSI”) Motion to Stay (Dkt. No 45) pending the resolution of ex parte reexamination proceeding of the patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6 ,041,953 (“the ’953 Patent). Having considered the Motion and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED for the reasons set forth herein. On July 7, 2017, Veraseal LLC (“Veraseal”) filed suit against Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC (collectively, “Walmart”). (See Dkt. No.