Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Agis Software Development LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00516 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00516, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
June 6, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 53 Motion to Change Venue
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Apple’s Motion to Transfer Venue under § 1404(a) to the Northern District of California. (Dkt. No. 53). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion the Motion should be DENIED for the reasons provided herein. I. LEGAL STANDARD If venue in the district in which the case is originally filed is proper, the court may nonetheless transfer a case based on “the convenience of parties and witnesses” to another district where the case could have been brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).