Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Soverain IP, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00293 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2017)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00293, Dkt. No. 39
Decided
December 18, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 34 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that 18 AT&T Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED-IN-PART as to AT&T Inc., and DENIED-IN-PART as to AT&T Services, and that AT&T Inc. is accordingly DISMIS…
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United Stat es Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 34), which recommends the Court grant -in-part and deny -in- part Defendants AT&T Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Under Rule 12(b)(3) (Docket No. 18). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommends that AT&T Inc.