Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Preferential Networks IP, LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00197 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00197, Dkt. No. 40
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 38 Report and Recommendations denying 18 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint, Sprints objections 39 OVERRULED
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Sprint Spectrum L.P., Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., and Boost Mobile LLC ( collectively, “Sprint”) object to Judge Payne’s recommendation that the defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied. Dkt. 39. Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).