Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Express Mobile, Inc. v. Svanaco, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00130 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2018)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00130, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
February 7, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 29, 2018, the Court heard argument on the proper constructions for disputed claim terms in U.S. Patents 6,546,397 and 7,594,168 (the Asserted Patents). 1 In general, the As- serted Patents are directed to technology for designing and building webpages. ’397 Patent at (57); ’168 Patent at (57). The inventions display an in-work webpage in real time so a web developer can view the webpage during edi ting as it would appear to an end user viewing the webpage through a browser. I. LEGAL PRINCIPLES A.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error