Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Realzoom LLC v. L Brands, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00118 (E.D. Tex. May 18, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00118, Dkt. No. 63
Decided
May 18, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER regarding Claim Construction
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 10, 2018, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No . 7,774,712 (“the ’712 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Docket Nos. 45, 46, & 48.1 The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings abou t the extrinsic evidence. See Phillips v. AWH Corp. , 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. , 135 S. Ct.