Preferential Networks IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility et al, No. 2:16-cv-01374 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) (Dkt. No. 19) be grante d in part. Defendants objected to the Report (Dkt. No. 45) and Preferential Networks responded (Dkt. No. 46).