Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Nagravision S.A. v. Comcast Corporation et al, No. 2:16-cv-01362 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01362, Dkt. No. 166
Decided
November 13, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Nagravision SA and Nagra France SAS’s (“Plaintiffs’ or “Nagravision’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 125). Also before the Court are Defendant Comcast Cable Communications LLC’s (“Defendant’s” or “Comcast’s”) Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 130) and Plaintiffs’ reply (Dkt. No. 136). The Court held a claim construction hearing on November 1, 2017. Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................