Axcess International, Inc. v. Amag Technology, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-01360 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. BACKGROUND These consolidated patent cases concern U.S. Patent 7,286,158, which is entitled “Method and System for Providing Integrated Remote Monitor Services.” The ’158 Patent purports to teach technology that “allow[s] a subscriber to remotely monitor, evaluate, and control operations at a facility.” ’158 Patent at 1:50–52.