Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC et al v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, No. 2:16-cv-00754 (E.D. Tex. May 19, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00754, Dkt. No. 86
Decided
May 19, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On May 2, 2017, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,437,416 (the “’416 Patent”)1. The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 67, 71, and 72) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).