Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Umbanet, Inc. v. Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00682 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00682, Dkt. No. 71
Decided
April 18, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Same As Dkt. 37) filed by Umbanet, Inc., 26 MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO ALLEGE INFRINGEMENT OF A PATENTABLE CLAIM UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 filed by Epsilon Data Man…
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Epsilon Data Management, LLC’s (“Epsilon”) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 26), arguing that the asserted patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and Plaintiff Umbanet, Inc.’s (“Umbanet”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 38) seeking to foreclose and dispose of Epsilon ’s § 101 defenses . Having considered the motions and for the reasons set forth below, Epsilon’s Motion is GRANTED as to U.S. Patent No. 7,444,374 (“the ’374 Patent”) and both motions are DENIED as to U.S. Patent No.