Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Effective Exploration, LLC v. Bluestone Natural Resources II, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00607 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00607, Dkt. No. 197
Decided
January 18, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 187 Motion for Attorney Fee's
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Having won summary judgment of noninfringement, BlueStone now moves to declare this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and requests $700,000 in attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 187. Although certain elements of this case and others filed by Effective Exploration weigh in favor of finding exceptionality, the totality of the circumstances do not justify such a finding. Accordingly, BlueStone’s motion is denied. BACKGROUND Effective Exploration is a non- practicing entity formed in 2013.