Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Google Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00571 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2017)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00571, Dkt. No. 41
Decided
March 20, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Netflix Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 2:16 -cv-574, Docket No. 15) and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Digital Services, Inc.’s (collectively, “Amazon”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Docket No. 20) 1, which is joined by the other 1 All references to “Docket No.” are to the docket in lead Case No. 2:16 -cv-570 unless specifically stated otherwise. Page 2 of 21 Defendants in this consolidated action.