Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Whirlpool Corporation v. Global Purification, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 11
Decided
May 15, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction and Attorney Fees (Dkt. No. 8 (“Motion”)). Having fully considered the arguments in the Motion, as well as the evidence presented by Plaintiff, the Court finds that this Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. Background and Procedural Requirements Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Global Purification, LLC (“Defendant”) on May 2, 2016. (Dkt. No.