Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Semcon IP Inc. v. STMicroelectronics Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00439, Dkt. No. 33
Decided
March 15, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 32 Report and Recommendations, denying 22 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 73) recommending denial of Dkt. No. 20 i n Case No. 2:16-c v-00437 (Huawei’s motion); Dkt. No. 22 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00439 (S TMicroelectronics’s motion); Dkt. No. 19 in Ca se No. 2:16-cv-00438 (MediaTek’s motion); and Dkt. No. 17 in Case No. 2:16-00440 (Texas Instruments’ motion) (c ollectively, “the Motions”). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Motions, and the subsequent Objections filed by Defendants (Dkt. Nos.