Semcon IP Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00438 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 73) recommending denial of Dkt. No. 20 i n Case No. 2:16-c v-00437 (Huawei’s motion); Dkt. No. 22 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00439 (S TMicroelectronics’s motion); Dkt. No. 19 in Ca se No. 2:16-cv-00438 (MediaTek’s motion); and Dkt. No. 17 in Case No. 2:16-00440 (Texas Instruments’ motion) (c ollectively, “the Motions”). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Motions, and the subsequent Objections filed by Defendants (Dkt. Nos.