Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. AVG Technologies USA, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00393 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00393, Dkt. No. 210
Decided
August 16, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: the constructions for the disputed and agreed terms of the Asserted Patents
Length
68 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On August 10, 2017, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,324,578 (“the ’578 Patent”), 6,728,766 (“the ’766 Patent”), 6,510,466 (“the ’466 Patent”), and 7,069,293 (“the ’293 Patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”).1 The Court has considered the argumen ts made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Docket Nos. 140, 150, 155, 174, 185 & 190.