Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00388 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00388, Dkt. No. 50
Decided
September 2, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***VACATED as per 56 USCA-FEDERAL CIRCUIT Judgment & Opinion, and 57 USCA-FEDERAL CIRCUIT MANDATE*** MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.’s Corrected Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 17). In this case, the fourth iteration of SimpleAir v. Google , SimpleAir once again asserts that Google’s Cloud Messaging and Cloud to Device Messaging services (collectively, “GCM”) infringe its patents related to push notification technology .