Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation et al, No. 2:16-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 143
Decided
October 25, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Comcast Defendants’1 Motions to Change Venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the Southern District of New York pursuant to forum -selection clauses in contracts between Comcast and Rovi (Case No. 2:16- cv-00321-RSP, Dkt. 78; Case No. 2:16 -cv-00322- JRG-RSP, Dkt. 67). Comcast STB filed unopposed Motions to Intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.