Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Consumer Cellular, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00152 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2017)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on March 8, 2017 (Dkt. No. 239) recommending that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 68, 103, and 113) be granted. Having considered the objections filed by Plaintiff and finding them to be without sufficient merit, the Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 68, 103, and 113) are GRANTED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error