Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Broadcom Limited et al, No. 2:16-cv-00134 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2017)

Denied
Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00134, Dkt. No. 188
Decided
February 27, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 64 SEALED MOTION (Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a)) filed by Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies, Ltd., LSI Corporation, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Broadcom Ltd., Broadcom Corp., Avago Technologies Ltd., Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., and LSI Corporation (“Defendants”)’s Motion to Tr ansfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 64) , specifically to the Northern District of California, to which Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“GK ”) filed a Res ponse in Opposition (Dkt. No. 97), Defendants filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 101) and GK filed a Sur-Reply (Dkt. No. 104). I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case