Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Neurovision Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Public Limited Company et al, No. 2:16-cv-00127 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00127, Dkt. No. 109
Decided
April 5, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
VACATED PER ORDER 118 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The parties in this patent infringement action appeared to have settled their dispute, but the final settlement agreement fell through when Defendants learned that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted inter partes review (IPR) of one of the asserted patents . Neurovision Medical Products, Inc. (“Neurovision”) now seeks emergency relief to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. ECF No. 102.