Saint Lawrence Communications LLC v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00082 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Preclude Plaintiff from Advancing Infringement Theories Not Disclosed in its P.R. 3-1 Contentions and Strike Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Apple’s Second Set of Individual Interrogatories (Dkt. No. 197) (“the Motion”). Having considered the Motion and for the reasons set for below, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. I. Background This case was filed by Plaintiff Saint Lawrence Communications LLC (“SLC”) against Apple on January 27, 2016. (Dkt. No.