PanOptis Patent Management, LLC et al v. Kyocera Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 10, 2017, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,019,332 (the “’332 Patent”), 8,102,833 (the “’833 Patent”) 8,174,506 (the “ ’506 Patent”), and 8,437,293 (the “’293 Patent”) (collectively the “Asserted Patents”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 99, 100, and 101) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v.