Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00056, Dkt. No. 214
Decided
May 24, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
57 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 16, 2017, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,638,750 (“the ’750 Patent”), 8,537,779 (“the ’779 Patent”), and 8,031,677 (“the ’677 Patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Dkt. Nos. 124, 130, 131, & 139.1 The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence. See Phillips v.