Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Whirlpool Corporation v. Ahmet Matt Ozcan d/b/a discountfilter, No. 2:15-cv-02103 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-02103, Dkt. No. 128
Decided
December 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Relief re: Claim Construction Proceedings (Dkt. No. 108) filed by Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation (“ Whirlpool”) and Defendants Pavel Water Filtration, Inc. and He nry H. Pavel (collectively, “Pavel”). The Motion notes that the claims of the single patent at issue in this c ase, U.S. Patent No. 7,000,894 (“the ʼ894 Patent”) , have previously been construed by this Court in Whirlpool Corporation v. TST Water, LLC , Case No. 2:15-cv-1528, Dkt. No. 59 (“the TST Water case”).