Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Pinterest, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01799 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss § 101 Eligibility Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01799, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
September 28, 2016
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Denying Without Prejudice 11 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) For Failure to State a Claim filed by Pinterest, Inc
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Objections 1 to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) in cases in which Plaintiff Cryp toPeak Solutions, LLC, alleges infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,202,150 (“ the ’150 Patent”). Defendants moved for dismissal on one or more of the following grounds: (1) the claims of the ’150 Patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error