GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01546 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent and trademark case, the Court will now consider Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses [Dkt. # 187]. Defendants seek fees and expenses from Plaintiff GeoDynamics under 35 U. S.C. § 285 and 15 U.S.C. § 1117. 1 After full briefing and argument on the motion, the Court will DENY the motion as to the patent claims but GRANT the motion as to the trademark claims. I.