Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH, No. 2:15-cv-01543 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01543, Dkt. No. 105
Decided
October 5, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
116 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On August 24, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 5,619,409, 5,636,124, 5,812,133, 5,818,711, 5,844,795, 5,845,149, 5,940,293, 6,138,174, 6,247,168, 6,675,226, 6,816,817, 6,978,225, 7,130,704, 7,143,366, 7,693,585, 7,716,567, and 7,836,122. Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos.