Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Whirlpool Corporation v. TST Water, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-01528 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01528, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
July 22, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 42), Defendant’s response (Dkt. No. 46), and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 47). The Court held a claim construction hearing on July 18, 2016. The Court addressed construction of the disputed terms in the patent-in-suit in a Provisional Claim Construction Order entered on July 19, 2016. (Dkt. No. 55.) That Provisional Claim Construction Order is superseded by this expanded Memorandum Opinion and Order, which is and shall be effective as of July 19, 2016.