Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

511 Innovations, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01524 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01524, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
October 26, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
41 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of 511 Innovations, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 139, filed on July 13, 2016),1 the response of AMS-TAOS USA Inc., ams AG, Huawei Device USA Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., ZTE (USA) Inc., Microsoft Mobile Inc., Microsoft Mobile Oy, Microsoft Corporation, Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., Avago Technologies Limited, Avago Technologies G eneral IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Avago Technologies Trading Ltd., Avago Technologies International Sales Pte.