Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:15-cv-01503 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2016)

Granted in Part
Discovery Contentions
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01503, Dkt. No. 129
Decided
July 22, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 TiVo's Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Interrogatory Nos. 1 & 4, Produce Associated Discovery, and Produce Customer Agreements; granting 71 Samsung's Motion to Compel TiVo to Respond t…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court held a hearing on July 11, 2016, re garding the following motions by Plaintiff TiVo and Defendant Samsung: TiVo’s Moti on to Compel Defendants to Respond to Interrogatory Nos. 1 & 4, Produce Associated Discovery, and Produce Customer Agreements (Dkt. No. 64); Samsung’s Motion to Compel TiVo to Respond to Interrogatory No. 18 (Dkt. No. 71); Samsung’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Am end Its First Amended Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. No. 72); TiVo’s Emergency Motion to Clar ify Discovery Obligations in Light of Prior Protective Orders (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error